The recently published FEED study - The Digital Brand Experience Report (by Razorfish) presents an analysis of the brand experience within the digital world and focuses much of its attention on social media. One of the central findings is that consumers "friend" brands on social networks because of deals and customer service, mostly egocentric motivations:
"Dell has earned kudos from social media mavens for generating $3 million in sales from its Dell Outlet through Twitter. Starbucks has soared to the top of Facebook brand pages, with nearly 4 million friends, by offering fans coupons for free pastries and ice cream. And Whole Foods tops Twitter with 1.5 million followers by broadcasting weekly specials and shopping tips."
While it's difficult to disagree with these data, I think there is more to learn behind the numbers. It would be easy for a marketer to point at these examples and shrug, saying "well, consumers are selfish, I guess. This is the only way to get them to have a relationship with us." Enter a deluge of ads, giveaways, and coupons into social media.
But are marketers responding to consumers, or is it the other way around? Going deeper - if we asked consumers if marketers are selfish, what would they say?
The great thing about digital and social media is that it offers new tools that enable a brand to be less selfish, where more traditional means of marketing have the selfishness baked in and as a marketer you have no choice. But make no mistake, just because you CAN be less selfish within social media doesn't mean you will be.
Measuring yourself on revenue driven, fans, or followers alone (which incidentally, I don't believe Dell, Whole Foods, or Starbucks are doing in reality) is an indicator that you might be focusing on the wrong thing and leaving much of potential that social media has to change the nature of your relationship with consumers on the table. These metrics are intrinsically selfish, whereas other metrics like like net promoter score, brand affinity, and plain-old customer satisfaction are a little more consumer-centric.
Beyond these measures, it's important to focus on how your marketing trains consumers. What is the nature of your relationship?
Is your relationship the same transactional one that TV spots and Flash-laden websites got you?
Did you get all those fans because you gave them free stuff and novelties?
Or is it something different, where that commercial relationship has become more personal? Did you instead get those fans because of what you represent, and because those fans recruited themselves and others?
Everything you do to your current and potential customers helps them understand how you want to be treated by them, and what to expect from you in the future. If they are treating you selfishly, it's probably because you (or someone like you - a competitor?) did it first. The good news is it doesn't have to be that way anymore.
Photo via the Melle Music blog
Doug Wick is a native Texan (Dallas) who recently moved to Austin from Chicago. His interests include music, wilderness, water, tequila, team sports involving a ball, web development, and writing about himself in the third person. Professionally, he is a sales and marketing leader currently working as the Director of Business Development and blogger at Powered. He is passionate about the Web and the way it is changing how we live our lives personally and professionally.
2 Comments
So I had a very interesting conversation yesterday w/ a new friend at Mozart's. Approximately 30 minutes of the epic few hour chat touched strongly on "Selfishness".
From a glance selfishness seems bad or at least is has always sounded bad. Like "greed", sounds bad, but as Gorden Gekko teachs us "greed is good." Not sure if I'd go that far, but you get what I am getting at.
Basically being selfish makes us very happy. Sometimes selfishness will also make us very unhappy if that is where we decide to take it. But on the whole selfishness generally gives us the most satisfaction so "why not" choose to be selfish.
I have found myself much happier as I focus on me being happy. It hasn't been very difficult for me to connect with some pretty good people (the key for me). I am a natural people pleaser so that can be hard to focus on me. I realized that I am not a commodity and I need Me to have all the Me I can afford. Not enough people championing the "Michael Cause". After focusing on me, I have found more me champions.
So I say be selfish. Just think about what you are doing. Some goodness, I'll leave you with.
The "Golden Rule"- treat others as you would wish to be treated.
The "Platinum Rule"-treat others as THEY would actually wish to be treated.
My inner research geek couldn't help but dig into the FEED PDF, and I couldn't help but notice the way the follow/friend a brand questions are worded:
"What is the PRIMARY reason you friend/follow a brand?"
Personally, bombarding me with offers, deals and sales pitches is the quickest way for a brand to get me to unfollow or unfriend them. Same goes for just about everyone I know. With that mindset, it's hard for me to make sense of the responses, but at the same time, I think limiting it to a PRIMARY reason may well be artificially inflating the importance of offers and deals.
I'd be VERY curious to see what the results would have looked like if they'd allowed for multiple answers. After all, people follow different brands for different reasons...
Post a Comment
Have a Facebook account? Click Connect with Facebook to leave a comment.
Or fill out this form to leave your comment.